Which is cheaper: FundingPips or The 5%ers?

The 5%ers is cheaper to enter. Its smallest evaluation account starts at $3K. FundingPips's entry tier begins at $5K. Challenge fees scale with account size, so a smaller tier means a lower up-front cost. Both firms also run discount codes from time to time. Right now that is 20% at FundingPips and 10% at The 5%ers.

Does FundingPips have a better profit split than The 5%ers?

Yes, FundingPips's top profit split (80% to 95%) is higher than The 5%ers's (50% to 80%). Take a $10,000 funded month with a $1,000 profit. A 95% split returns $950, versus $800 on a 80% split. That is about $150 more per month at the same risk. Note that top splits often need scaling milestones. Check the funded-phase rules before you assume you will hit the top tier on day one.

Which firm pays out faster: FundingPips or The 5%ers?

Both FundingPips and The 5%ers pay on a similar schedule (N/A vs N/A). So the deciding factor is your withdrawal method. Crypto and Skrill clear in hours. Bank wires add 1 to 3 business days at either firm.

Can I trade at both FundingPips and The 5%ers?

Yes. FundingPips and The 5%ers are independent firms, and neither requires exclusivity. You can hold a funded account at both at once, as long as you respect each firm's rules on each account. Many traders spread evaluations across firms to cut counterparty risk. Each firm tracks its own rule breaches, so a breach at one does not affect the other.

FundingPips vs The 5%ers

Editorial intro

Comparing FundingPips and The 5%ers comes down to profit split mechanics: FundingPips offers 80% to 95% profit splits and $300K max capital with regular payouts, while The 5%ers counters with 50% to 80% splits and $597.5K max capital on a regular payout cadence. We've ranked FundingPips at 4.1/5 and The 5%ers at 4.1/5 based on our editorial scoring. Both firms operate in the retail prop trading space and have published payout records that we've cross-checked against trader-reported withdrawals. Below is the full side-by-side breakdown across 14 decision-relevant attributes, our editor's verdict on which trader profile each firm fits best, and the most-searched questions about this specific match-up.

Attribute	FundingPips	The 5%ers
Profit Split	80% to 95%	50% to 80%
Max Funded Capital	$300K	$597.5K
Years in Operation	3	10
Headquartered	United Arab Emirates	United Kingdom
Rating (editorial)	4.1/5	4.1/5
Payout Frequency	N/A	N/A
Active Discount	20%	10%
Platforms	cTrader, Match Trader, MT5	cTrader, MT5
Drawdown Type	,	,
Consistency Rule	No	Yes
Asset Coverage	Indices, Energy, FX, Metals, Crypto	Metals, Indices, Crypto, Other Commodities, Energy, FX
Min Account Size	$5K	$3K
Profit Target	10%	8% / 5%
Trading Days Min	,	,

View FundingPips →View The 5%ers →

Our Verdict: FundingPips vs The 5%ers

FundingPips is better for:

▸Maximising profit retention (80% to 95% vs 50% to 80%)
▸More trading platforms supported (3 vs 2)
▸Traders preferring a United Arab Emirates-jurisdictioned firm

The 5%ers is better for:

▸Scaling to larger accounts ($597.5K vs $300K)
▸Track record (10+ years vs 3 years)
▸Broader instrument coverage (6 asset classes vs 5)

Editor's note

For most traders, FundingPips wins on profit split (80% to 95% vs 50% to 80%), but The 5%ers is the better pick if you want the larger scaling ceiling ($597.5K vs $300K). Our overall editorial pick: FundingPips.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

FundingPips vs The 5%ers: Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, FundingPips is the stronger pick on our composite score. It wins on profit split (80% to 95% vs 50% to 80%). It also posts a better editorial score than The 5%ers once you weight rating, profit split, and history together. That said, The 5%ers is still the better choice if want the larger scaling ceiling ($597.5K vs $300K).