Which is cheaper: Aquafunded or FundedNext?

FundedNext is cheaper to enter. Its smallest evaluation account starts at $2K. Aquafunded's entry tier begins at $3K. Challenge fees scale with account size, so a smaller tier means a lower up-front cost. Both firms also run discount codes from time to time. Right now that is 50% at Aquafunded and BOGO at FundedNext.

Does Aquafunded have a better profit split than FundedNext?

Yes, Aquafunded's top profit split (90%) is higher than FundedNext's (70% to 80%). Take a $10,000 funded month with a $1,000 profit. A 90% split returns $900, versus $800 on a 80% split. That is about $100 more per month at the same risk. Note that top splits often need scaling milestones. Check the funded-phase rules before you assume you will hit the top tier on day one.

Which firm pays out faster: Aquafunded or FundedNext?

Both Aquafunded and FundedNext pay on a similar schedule (Withdrawals processed through crypto or Riseworks upon meeting account requirements vs N/A). So the deciding factor is your withdrawal method. Crypto and Skrill clear in hours. Bank wires add 1 to 3 business days at either firm.

Can I trade at both Aquafunded and FundedNext?

Yes. Aquafunded and FundedNext are independent firms, and neither requires exclusivity. You can hold a funded account at both at once, as long as you respect each firm's rules on each account. Many traders spread evaluations across firms to cut counterparty risk. Each firm tracks its own rule breaches, so a breach at one does not affect the other.

Aquafunded vs FundedNext

Editorial intro

Comparing Aquafunded and FundedNext comes down to profit split mechanics: Aquafunded offers 90% profit splits and $400K max capital with regular payouts, while FundedNext counters with 70% to 80% splits and $300K max capital on a regular payout cadence. We've ranked Aquafunded at 4.3/5 and FundedNext at 3.9/5 based on our editorial scoring. Both firms operate in the United Arab Emirates regulatory environment and have published payout records that we've cross-checked against trader-reported withdrawals. Below is the full side-by-side breakdown across 14 decision-relevant attributes, our editor's verdict on which trader profile each firm fits best, and the most-searched questions about this specific match-up.

Attribute	Aquafunded	FundedNext
Profit Split	90%	70% to 80%
Max Funded Capital	$400K	$300K
Years in Operation	2	4
Headquartered	United Arab Emirates	United Arab Emirates
Rating (editorial)	4.3/5	3.9/5
Payout Frequency	Withdrawals processed through crypto or Riseworks upon meeting account requirements	N/A
Active Discount	50%	BOGO
Platforms	cTrader, Match Trader, MT5, TradeLocker	Match Trader, MT4, MT5
Drawdown Type	,	,
Consistency Rule	Yes	No
Asset Coverage	Crypto, Other Commodities, Metals, Indices, FX	Crypto, FX, Indices, Other Commodities
Min Account Size	$3K	$2K
Profit Target	3%	8% / 4%
Trading Days Min	,	,

View Aquafunded →View FundedNext →

Our Verdict: Aquafunded vs FundedNext

Aquafunded is better for:

▸Traders prioritising verified reputation (4.3 vs 3.9 editorial rating)
▸Maximising profit retention (90% vs 70% to 80%)
▸Scaling to larger accounts ($400K vs $300K)
▸Broader instrument coverage (5 asset classes vs 4)

FundedNext is better for:

▸Track record (4+ years vs 2 years)
▸Traders who already follow FundedNext and want to stay inside its ecosystem

Editor's note

For most traders, Aquafunded wins on verified rating (4.3 vs 3.9), but FundedNext is the better pick if you prefer FundedNext's rule set or jurisdiction. Our overall editorial pick: Aquafunded.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Aquafunded vs FundedNext: Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, Aquafunded is the stronger pick on our composite score. It wins on verified rating (4.3 vs 3.9). It also posts a better editorial score than FundedNext once you weight rating, profit split, and history together. That said, FundedNext is still the better choice if prefer FundedNext's rule set or jurisdiction.